As a fan, it is easy to get caught up this time of year in the little tidbits and nuggets written by members of the mainstream media. Make no mistake, the reports regarding trade rumors are often contradictory, but in the end the stories usually consist of one struggling organization demanding a king’s ransom for an overrated veteran and another team either desperately willing to meet the price or a stalemate in negotiations all-together. The image left for most fans to carve out of a mess like this is a bunch of grizzled, cigar-chomping, obstinate General Managers unwilling to do what is necessary to rebuild their fledgling franchises.
If only we could tap ourselves on the shoulder every now and than and remind ourselves that we are dealing with a bunch of young statesman/economists armed with pocket protectors and Ivy League educations to their credit who would have made brilliant political operatives or Wall Street executives if they were not as obsessed with baseball as we are. This explains why I have heard my share of horror stories in the past about writers, many of whom had the best of intentions, been the victims of what ultimately turns out to be blatantly false information when in fact the difference between the wheat and the chaf is so varnished it is impossible to distinguish between the two; because the truth is that many writers are either getting their info from bottom level scouts and executives who are hardly more privy than we are to trade rumors, or, more often, from high ranking officials whose chief aim is to beguile for obvious reasons. (Derek Carty over at The Hardball Times has an excellent piece on this matter, focusing on some of Paul DePodesta’s statements on his personal blog.)
Today’s deal that sent Xavier Nady and Damaso Martepacking to the New York Yankees for four prospects is a perfect example of this. While every ones opinion on this deal is basically contingent upon their thoughts on Jose Tabata,* the point is that the reports in the media suggested that the price for Nady alone would be far higher. Jayson Stark wrote this morning that Nady would cost, ‘one sure thing, one good prospect, and one more iffy prospect.’ Jose Tabta, who has hit .249/.310/310 in 294 at-bats for AA Trenton thus far and has some major makeup concerns, is far from a “sure thing.” (I was thinking more F-Mart if not Mike Pelfrey myself when I heard this.) In addition, when I hear the term “good prospect” thrown around, that usually applies to guys like Nick Evans and or Jon Niese, both of whom I would hesitate to give up in a package for Nady, and not George Kontos, who does have some sleeper potential. I believe labeling Ross Ohlendorf or Phil Coke an “iffy” prospect” is too polite, given the fact clones of these two can be found in just about every AAA rotation.
I admit I exaggerated when I told a friend following this deal that the Pirates “got quantity but absolutely no quality.” After all, despite all his struggles, Tabata is yet to turn 20 and they were comparing this guy to Fernando Martinez just a year ago, with several insiders telling me they preferred the Yankees stud. Therefore, I am pretty ambivalent about who will end up the winner down the line. When I put together what I thought was a fair equivalent deal for the Mets, however- Ruben Tejada, Dylan Owen, and two of either Salvador Aguilar, Tobi Stoner, or Bobby Parnell, it does not look so bad does it?
Filed under: Baseball, New York Yankees, Xavier Nady | Tagged: jose tabata, New York Mets, New York Yankees, Xavier Nady | Leave a Comment »